Journals
Advanced Photonics
Photonics Insights
Advanced Photonics Nexus
Photonics Research
Advanced Imaging
View All Journals
Chinese Optics Letters
High Power Laser Science and Engineering
Articles
Optics
Physics
Geography
View All Subjects
Conferences
CIOP
HPLSE
AP
View All Events
News
About CLP
Search by keywords or author
Login
Registration
Login in
Registration
Search
Search
Articles
Journals
News
Advanced Search
Top Searches
metasurface
laser
nir
lithium niobate
optical coherence tomography
OAM
Home
All Issues
Journals >
>
Topics >
Machine learning in statistical physics
Contents
Machine learning in statistical physics
|
1 Article(s)
Inverse Ising techniques to infer underlying mechanisms from data
Hong-Li Zeng, and Erik Aurell
As a problem in data science the inverse Ising (or Potts) problem is to infer the parameters of a Gibbs–Boltzmann distributions of an Ising (or Potts) model from samples drawn from that distribution. The algorithmic and computational interest stems from the fact that this inference task cannot be carried out efficiently by the maximum likelihood criterion, since the normalizing constant of the distribution (the partition function) cannot be calculated exactly and efficiently. The practical interest on the other hand flows from several outstanding applications, of which the most well known has been predicting spatial contacts in protein structures from tables of homologous protein sequences. Most applications to date have been to data that has been produced by a dynamical process which, as far as it is known, cannot be expected to satisfy detailed balance. There is therefore no a priori reason to expect the distribution to be of the Gibbs–Boltzmann type, and no a priori reason to expect that inverse Ising (or Potts) techniques should yield useful information. In this review we discuss two types of problems where progress nevertheless can be made. We find that depending on model parameters there are phases where, in fact, the distribution is close to Gibbs–Boltzmann distribution, a non-equilibrium nature of the under-lying dynamics notwithstanding. We also discuss the relation between inferred Ising model parameters and parameters of the underlying dynamics.
As a problem in data science the inverse Ising (or Potts) problem is to infer the parameters of a Gibbs–Boltzmann distributions of an Ising (or Potts) model from samples drawn from that distribution. The algorithmic and computational interest stems from the fact that this inference task cannot be carried out efficiently by the maximum likelihood criterion, since the normalizing constant of the distribution (the partition function) cannot be calculated exactly and efficiently. The practical interest on the other hand flows from several outstanding applications, of which the most well known has been predicting spatial contacts in protein structures from tables of homologous protein sequences. Most applications to date have been to data that has been produced by a dynamical process which, as far as it is known, cannot be expected to satisfy detailed balance. There is therefore no a priori reason to expect the distribution to be of the Gibbs–Boltzmann type, and no a priori reason to expect that inverse Ising (or Potts) techniques should yield useful information. In this review we discuss two types of problems where progress nevertheless can be made. We find that depending on model parameters there are phases where, in fact, the distribution is close to Gibbs–Boltzmann distribution, a non-equilibrium nature of the under-lying dynamics notwithstanding. We also discuss the relation between inferred Ising model parameters and parameters of the underlying dynamics.
showLess
Chinese Physics B
Publication Date: Jan. 01, 2020
Vol. 29, Issue 8, (2020)
Get PDF
View fulltext
Topics
General
Invited Review
Machine learning in statistical physics
Modeling and simulations for the structures and functions of proteins and nucleic acids
Optical field manipulation
Phononics and phonon engineering
Physics in neuromorphic devices
Rapid Communication
Review
SPECIAL TOPIC – Phononics and phonon engineering
SPECIAL TOPIC – Terahertz physics
Terahertz physics
Topological 2D materials
Ultracold atom and its application in precision measurement
Water at molecular level